Renewable Energy Must Not Come at the Expense of Community Rights
The transition to clean energy is critical for reducing dependence on fossil fuels and combating climate change. However, this shift must be implemented responsibly, ensuring that communities are not burdened with unintended consequences. Placing industrial wind turbines in residential neighborhoods is not just poor planning, it can infringe upon the rights and well-being of those who live there.
While wind turbines symbolize progress in renewable energy, they also pose significant challenges when located too close to homes. Noise pollution, shadow flicker, and health concerns are not abstract nuisances but documented issues. Low-frequency noise disrupts sleep and increases stress, while shadow flicker can cause migraines and even trigger seizures in sensitive individuals. These effects erode residents’ ability to enjoy peace and security in their own homes.
Fairhaven offers a case study in what happens when turbines are poorly sited. The existing turbines have demonstrated reliability and maintenance failures, along with negative community impacts. Proposing even larger turbines without addressing these concerns risks making the situation worse. A better alternative exists — solar energy. Solar farms provide clean energy without noise, flicker, or visual disruption, making them a more compatible option for residential areas.
Globally, there are models of responsible renewable energy development. In the Netherlands, wind turbines are strategically placed in industrial zones or greenfields, away from homes. This approach expands renewable infrastructure without disrupting communities. We should follow a similar principle — prioritizing locations that do not compromise residents’ quality of life.
At the core of this issue is community consent. Impact studies can be influenced by those conducting them, making it essential that residents closest to these projects have a direct say. A local vote among those living within three miles of proposed turbines would ensure the voices of those most affected carry real weight in the decision-making process.
Advocating for responsible energy development requires a fact-based approach. Overstating concerns weakens credibility, while distinguishing between appropriate offshore wind projects and problematic residential turbine placements strengthens the argument. Offshore wind has proven successful, but industrial turbines in neighborhoods are a different challenge entirely.
Renewable energy is necessary, but it must not come at the cost of community health and well-being. Wind turbines do not belong in residential areas when better alternatives exist. We must pursue solutions like solar farms and thoughtful wind turbine placement, ensuring that clean energy benefits everyone without harm.
I encourage residents to attend the upcoming Selectboard meeting (1/13/25) and advocate for a process that respects both environmental progress and community rights. Together, we can achieve a sustainable future that aligns with the values and integrity of our town.
Eric R. Dawicki, MPA, President, Northeast Maritime Institute —College of Maritime Science
•••
Click here to download the 1/9/25 issue: 01-09-25 PolarPlunge
Support local journalism, donate to the Neighb News with PayPal
